CESR-c


Lattice studies

bmad_scsk0_20070115-1.lat
January 15, 12 wiggler, 1.885GeV, 3pair compensation of bmad_12wig_20050626a.lat using anti-solenoid, with sc_sk01 = 0, IR quads and sc_sk02 and sk_02, and Q3->Q6. Reoptimized sextupoles.

bmad_3770_20061213.lat
December 13, 2006, 12 wiggler, 1.885GeV, 4pair compensation of bmad_12wig_20050626a.lat using anti-solenoid, IR quads and IR skews, and Q3->Q6

bmad_12wig_20050626a.lat
12 wiggler, 1.885GeV

january 1, 2004
24 hour record and lum and dqv vs current for d001.2004

Lost particles
Weak strong simulation, lost particles

Luminosity vs turn
Simulated luminosity weak strong, vs turn

Luminosity vs current
Simulated luminosity weak strong

Energy optimized sextupoles
Sextupoles optimized to minimize dBeta/dE

Dynamic aperture
Explore dynamic aperture as a function of sextupole distribution for injection

beambeam tune scans
Weak strong tune scans, 6/12 wiggler optics

bmad_4170_2ma_120505.lat
December 5, 2005, 12 wiggler, 2.1GeV, wigglers scaled from 19.5kG (121A) at 2.08GeV, 4 pair compensation, lrbbi compensation for bunch 3, 9X5X2mA

bmad_4160_111005.lat
November 10 2005, 12 wiggler, 2.1GeV, wigglers scaled from 19.5kG (121A) at 2.08GeV, 4 pair compensation

bmad_4200_100305.lat
October 3, 2005, 12 wiggler, 2.1GeV, wigglers scaled from 19.5kG (121A) at 2.13GeV, 4 pair compensation

bmad_4260_092605_v1.lat
September 26, 2005, 12 wiggler, 2.13GeV, wigglers at 121A, 19.5kG

bmad_bend_5piece_nosol_v01.lat
June 23, 2005, distributed radiation, no solenoid. Arc bends divided into 5 segments with opposite bending field. Damping time ~ same as for 12 1.2T wigglers.

bmad_jpsi_071305.lat
July 13, 2005, 1.51GeV, 12 2.1T wigglers, antisolenoids, Q0 tilt=1.9deg

bmad_fixq0_asol_4pair_v7.lat
September 16, 2005, q0 angle fixed = 4.5, anti-solenoid, q1, q2, sk2 skews => 4 pair compensation

bmad_q0_q1_q2_comp_sk2_080605.lat
June 8, 2005, Anti-solenoid, q0 angle, q1, q2, sk2 skews optimized to minimize energy dependence of IR insert.

bmad_nowig_250505.lat
May 31, 2005. Wigglers. L3 like hibetinj.

bmad_bend_5piece_v02.lat
March 16, 2005. No wigglers. Arc bends divided into 5 segments with opposite bending field. Damping time ~ same as for 12 1.2T wigglers.

bmad_c_q0_040305.lat
March 4, 2005. Modified hibetainj_20040628_v01.lat for compensating solenoid. Q0 tilt is parameter. 4-pair compensation with q0 tilt, sc_sk_q01, sc_sk_q02, sk_q02. New sextupoles.

bmad_c_020305.lat
March 2, 2005. Modified hibetainj_20040628_v01.lat for compensating solenoid. New sextupoles.

bmad_14kg_021505.lat
February 22, 2005. Modified hibetainj_20040628_v01.lat for 14kg wigglers New sextupoles.

bmad_hibetainj_c21zero_v01.lat
12wiggler 1.89GeV lattice, February 2005. SCMATING 2 sets c21=0

bmad_hibetainj_nosol_v01.lat
February 4, 2005. Modified hibetainj_20040628_v01.lat for solenoid off quad south of 15. New sextupoles.

hibetainj_20040628_v04_o1_s2.lat
12wiggler 1.89GeV lattice, December 2004 - layout 6/23, taylor_order=1, sextupoles to minimize amplitude dependent tune shift and energy dependence and refinement of s1

hibetainj_20040628_v04_o1_s1.lat
12wiggler 1.89GeV lattice, December 2004 - layout 6/23, taylor_order=1, sextupoles to minimize amplitude dependent tune shift

hibetainj_20040628_v04_o1.lat
12wiggler 1.89GeV lattice, October 2004 - layout 6/23, taylor_order=1

hibetavert_20040702.lat
12wiggler 1.89GeV lattice, July 2004 - layout 6/23, beta*_v = 2cm

hibetainj_20040628_v01.lat
12wiggler 1.89GeV lattice, June 2004 - layout 6/23

HEP_20040623_v01.lat
12wiggler 1.89GeV lattice, June 2004 - layout 6/23

HEP_20040614_v05s.lat
12wiggler 1.89GeV lattice, June 2004 - layout 6/14

low_emitt_ew_sym_20040503.lat
12wiggler 1.89GeV lattice, April 2004 - ew symmetric quads, sextupoles, wigglers, separators

bmad_l9a18a000._moverec
Phase II 5.289GeV lattice, March 2001

bmad_12wig_20040202
12 wiggler lattice, 2/18/04

low_emitt_20040212_v2
Low emittance, 12 wiggler lattice, 2/17/04

bmad_6wig_20030915_v1
Details of 6 wiggler, pretzel on lattice for low energy machine studies that will be loaded 9/16/03

bmad_6wig_20030915_v4
Details of 6 wiggler, pretzel on lattice, with 4-pair compensation, for HEP beginning 12/2003

bmad_6wigs_scr_20030729_v1_o3.lat
Details of 6 wiggler, pretzel off lattice for low energy machine studies

bmad_6wigs_lum_7_28_03_o3.lat
Details of 6 wiggler lattice for low energy machine studies 7/28/03

passive cavity
Effect of operating with one or more passive cavities on closed orbits and optics

single wiggler lattice - best luminosity
1.9T optics bmad_1885mev_1wig_r1_19.lat

single wiggler lattice
1.9T optics bmad_1885mev_1wig_s1_19.lat

six wiggler lattice (latest)
2 7-pole and 4 8-pole wigglers in the east

tune scans
tune scans with various parasitic interactions and initializations in six wiggler lattice

six wiggler lattice (chronology)
early versions : 2 7-pole and 4 8-pole wigglers in the east

tune scans
with single wiggler optics

cubic nonlinearity (PS)
fitted cubic nonlinearity for 7 and 8 pole

DA-study
Dynamic aperture for evolving 7 and 8 pole lattices, 1-July-2002 ->

Comparison
of dynamic aperture for 7 and 8 pole wigglers using vector fields tables for wiggler tracking -> 30-June-2002, 15-August-2002

Wiggler mapping
Integration through VF data, fitted data, and taylor mapping

Wiggler maps used for 6 wiggler lattice design
Integration through VF data, fitted data, taylor mapping, and symplectic integration

Phase space plots
Phase space for long term tracking


Multiple scattering in injection channel details

Site visit March 5, 2002

  • overview
  • accelerator physics
  • wiggler

  • Dynamic aperture and tune scans (R.Helms)

    Dynamic aperture is computed for 2,4,6,8,10,12, and 14 wigglers. Wiggler model is based on MERMAID calculation and tracking by runge_kutta integration. The lattice is bmad_rk_v_custom. There are also tune scans for linearized as well as MERMAID modelled wigglers. And calculation of tune shift vs oscillation amplitude and effect of correction with octupoles. helms ---------------------------------------------------

    CBN 01-21
  • Effects of Parasitic Crossings on Tunes (S.Buchan and D.Rubin)
    • Calculation of dependence of
      • tune
      • beta*
      • closed orbit
    • on number of bunches, bunch current, for various 5.3, and 1.89GeV optics
    ---------------------------------------------------

    Synchrotron radiation power density (7-dec-2001)

  • Synchrotron radiation power on inside and outside walls
    • Lattice : [cesr.2gev.rkwig]bmad_rk_v_custom_linear.
    • Beam energy = 1.88 GeV.
    • Pretzel is on
    • Vertical emittance is 2nm.
    • Beam current is 100mA/beam
    • Wiggler period = ~40cm
    • Wiggler B=2.1T
  • Mask to shadow sliding joint from wiggler radiation on the inside of the ring
     Lattice: bmad_dhrmove_v27.
     
      Wiggler       beta_x (m)         pretzel (mm)    nearest quad
        1             15.5                7.5              Q13
        2             18.3               13.4             Q13-Q14
        3             24.8               15.6              Q14
        4             6.4                 5.9              Q15
        5             26.4              -16.7              Q18
        6             23.5              -14.5             Q18-Q19
        7             16.               -12.4              Q19
    
    In this lattice the pretzel maximum is at the north end of Q18 which
    is also the south end of wiggler #5. The next largest amplitude is
    at the north end of Q14 which is about a meter from the north end
    of wiggler #3. Without a redesign of the optics, the proposed 4mm mask
    would limit pretzel amplitude.
    
    
    ---------------------------------------------------

    3-pole wiggler field measurements

  • plot B_y vs z at x=1.5cm - September 1, 2001
  • plot B_y vs z at x=6.4cm - September 1, 2001
  • plot B_y vs z at x=1.5cm - September 11, 2001
  • plot B_y vs z at x=6.4cm - September 11, 2001
  • plot (B_y(6.4cm) - B_y(1.5cm) vs z - September 1, 2001
  • plot (B_y(-6.4cm) - B_y(-1.5cm) vs z - September 11, 2001
  • plot (B_y(6.4cm) - B_y(1.5cm) vs z - September 11, 2001
  • plot B_y vs x in the midplane at the center of the 3-20 model

  • The following plots show the integrated vertical field of the 7 pole wiggler vs x and the resulting horizontal kick to a 1.89 GeV beam. The average kick is zeroed. The fields are calculated with MERMAID. The "trimmed" field refers to an attempt to adjust trim windings on the poles to reduce horizontal dependence, and evidently not quite right.
    ---------------------------------------------------

    beta_orbit closed orbit, beta and eta for BMAD_DHRMOVE_V27. - 14 wiggler, 1.88GeV lattice, B_cleo = 1T

    beta_cbar beta and cbar in IR for BMAD_DHRMOVE_V27. - 14 wiggler, 1.88GeV lattice, B_cleo = 1T

    Round beam optics and aperture

    Tune scans with and without wigglers

    Machine sudies

  • Phase/coupling measured vs design BMAD_1843MEV_LRBBI.LAT
    • This lattice is designed for better separation in IR.
    • Crossing angle is about 2.6mrad
    • Beta_h ~ 0.6m